I’m convinced the antitrust problems those ads are causing (not to mention loss of developer goodwill) are not worth the money they generate. Purposes, and that the changes are designed to protect customers’Īpple should just abandon selling ads in the App Store. Apple has said that unlikeįacebook, it doesn’t share user data with others for advertising Such as a device’s location, with other apps and advertisers.Īpple isn’t requesting such permission to track users of its ownĪpps, giving it an unfair advantage in serving ads in the App Transparency, which requires iPhone and iPad users toĪffirmatively opt in to let developers share personal information, Of particular concern to app developers is Apple’s App Tracking The complaints aren’t really about Apple’s apps having access to your location but the system itself having access. I wish I could make it ask me less frequently. They say that, but I get prompted to re-confirm allowing Apple’s iOS Weather to always access my location frequently. Restrictions on location tracking that its own apps don’t have toįollow, said several people with knowledge of the matter. The probe also is examining complaints about how Apple places I strongly suspect that it’s not “Sign In With Apple” itself, but the corresponding App Store rule that requires any app that offers the ability to sign in with a third-party service (which, in practice, primarily targets Google and Facebook, and to a lesser degree Twitter) to also support “Sign In With Apple”. Interest in the sign-in button earlier this year. More antitrust news, from Josh Sisco, reporting for The Information (alas, paywall-protected):Īnd Apple’s opponents have raised other issues including theĬompany’s “Sign in with Apple” offering, a button placed on appsĪnd websites that allows people to sign in using their Apple Don’t let yourself be lulled into inaction.” The Information: ‘Apple Very Likely to Face DOJ Antitrust Suit’ ★ The entire Apple silicon story - along with the Affinity Photo team’s prescient bet - feels like a perfect illustration of the Bill Gates axiom: “We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next ten. But here I am, typing this sentence on that laptop. Performance, immense on-chip bandwidth and immediate transfer ofĪ laptop GPU outperforming a $6,000 300-watt (300 watts!) desktop GPU. $6000, 300W desktop part - because it has immense compute The #M1Max is the fastest GPU we have ever measured in Photo benchmark. Later it did exist - but it was in an iPad 😬!įast-forward a few tweets in the thread to today: Wondered if we had backed the wrong horse. We shipped Photo in 2015 - six years after the design phase -Ī GPU which did all the things we needed simply didn’t exist. Risk and designed the entire architecture based on thatĪssumption. Thought that eventually the industry would get there, so we took a Way back in 2009, no GPU did all three things well - but we High compute performance 2.) Fast on-chip bandwidth 3.) Fast In Photo, an ideal GPU would do three different things well: 1.) Tuesday, 26 October 2021 Putting M1 Max GPU Performance in Context ★Īndy Somerfield, lead for (the great) Affinity Photo app: But if you get a new MacBook with the notch, I encourage you to just live with it for a few days. The notch is going to bother some people, so utilities like this were inevitable. Free utility from the makers of CleanShot - an excellent screen capture tool - that disguises the notch on new MacBook Pros by making the desktop area behind the menu bar black, no matter which desktop picture you use.
0 kommentar(er)
